A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours more than the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted countrywide notice next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental problems, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments article about René Collier along with the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their preparing authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are issue to strict controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in a sensitive coastal atmosphere which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, and that is partially designed, is in the correct position. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, where views of the sea are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, a picture that has because turn into emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they had been intended to Collect Visible proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the h2o all through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site turned Just about the most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of actions were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial instant in the legal timeline.
For the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply wanting to establish a loved ones Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes entering The ocean for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a situation that lots of observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-substantial water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other long once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case extend further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental defense and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, taken off, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.